Share this article:
Print

Former Congressman William Jefferson still eligible for Congressional pension

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by Maya Rodriguez / Eyewitness News

Posted on November 17, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Updated Tuesday, Nov 17 at 5:37 PM

******

NEW ORLEANS -- It is an employment benefit afforded to members of Congress after five years of service -- a Congressional pension. Yet, despite his recent conviction on bribery, money laundering and racketeering charges and a subsequent 13-year prison sentence, former Congressman William Jefferson will still be able to receive his pension.

"Mr. Jefferson was abusing his office to steal from us, the people, and he's not now entitled to have us support him for the rest of his life," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

Two years ago, Congress passed a law that tried to change that. Both the House and Senate approved the Congressional Pension Accountability Act of 2007. It revokes the pensions of members of Congress if they are convicted of certain crimes, such as bribery, perjury and fraud.

For the law, though, it all comes down to timing.

"When they passed the law, they made it clear that it only applied to crimes that were committed after the enactment of the law," Sloan said. "So, no matter what you did before the enactment of the law, even if you get convicted of it several years later, you're going to get your pension."

That is what happened in Jefferson's case. He was convicted of crimes that happened before the 2007 law went into effect-- meaning he is still eligible for a Congressional pension, which could range from $40,000 to 55,000 a year.

"He, in effect, is grandfathered in," said Eyewitness News Political Analyst Clancy DuBos. "I'm sure it's a big disappointment to a lot of people, who feel that he should forfeit his pension for having used his office in the manner that he did."

The way lawmakers wrote the pension accountability law, comes as no surprise to some.

"The people who have to make the law are very conscious of the fact that, one day, they may be held accountable or punished by that law," said political analyst Dr. Silas Lee.

It is an imperfect law, critics say. However, they also point out that, despite the imperfections, the pension accountability act is a start.

"Better some law, than no law -- and that was really the choice at the time," Sloan said. "I would have had a really broad law that said any member of Congress who's convicted of a felony should lose their pension. Be that as it may, that's not what happened."

"If there is a silver lining to all this, is that going forward, anybody who commits these types of crimes, will not be able to collect a pension," DuBos said.

The accountability act passed unanimously in both the House and Senate. Jefferson-- who was serving in the House at the time -- voted in favor of the act. It passed several months before his indictment.
 

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

Remember Please be respectful of others when posting comments. Play nice. IP addresses are logged and can be banned.

HTML is not allowed.

gotabyte said on November 17, 2009 at 5:05 PM

Doesn't that stink. My money supporting another criminal!

fujitafan1 said on November 17, 2009 at 5:23 PM

Gotabyte expressed my sentiments prefectly. Can't improve on that comment.

lovinlife said on November 17, 2009 at 6:24 PM

what an absolute joke and an insult to the American taxpayers.

proudvet said on November 17, 2009 at 6:35 PM

If Mr Jefferson is allowed to retain his VERY substantial Congressional pension then he should not be allowed to file for bankruptcy and get out from all his debts. His debts should be taken out of his pension, even the amount of money the government says he needs to pay in penalties..........

catsyd2 said on November 17, 2009 at 7:30 PM

If I remember correctly it was Congress who voted in this ludrice law that allows people in public office who are convicted of serious crimes to continue to receive their pensions. I believe Jefferson was one of the ones who voted this in. They sure were covering their dishonest butts.

haywood said on November 17, 2009 at 7:52 PM

He needs to be in jail, why is this being delayed? His whole family needs to be in there as well and certainly for more than 13 yrs. Congressional or Presidential pardon, no way!!!!!!!!

firechief620 said on November 17, 2009 at 7:58 PM

The tax payers should use his pension to pay for the cost to keep him in jail

dloud said on November 17, 2009 at 8:29 PM

This pension should be used to offset the expensive cost of his trial which he could have avoided by pleading guilty from the begining. I have no compassion for this dirt bag.

ironpony said on November 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM

The way normal things progress in D.C., is, I am in this office and you can't expect me to stab myself in the back. There should be an amendment to the constitution where the general public can, during a presidental election, place a proposal on the ballet that would be a benefit to the people of the U.S. Too many things are being pushed to the side by our present elected officials because they are adverse to their getting their goodies. They won't pass a health bill like their's because it will let us know what it cost to take care of them. They knew that Jefferson had done wrong but to make a change that would be retroactive back to the time when his crime started would have hurt their pensions, so they don't do it. What needs to be done is to get rid of our problem, get some new elected officials and if they don't do the right thing, get rid of them, and if what they are doing, JAIL THEM.....

joanna040572 said on November 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM

Don't yall think he received enough money from the stealing he did. JUST A THOUGHT

mjguillo said on November 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM

To me the most appalling thing about this story is that members of congress get a pension after 5 years of service! How many of us are eligible for pension after 5 years of working. I'll tell you - none!

ronbeaux said on November 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM

Another example of how these shills protect themselves. A convicted criminal, going to prison and collects his money anyway. What a crock. But I guess when they work hard every fighting for us then it looks like it is worth it. All they fight for is not to get caught and their next election.