Share this article:
Print

Abortion issue constantly dogs Senator Landrieu

by Kevin McGill / Associated Press

Posted on December 10, 2009 at 9:31 PM

Updated Thursday, Dec 10 at 9:31 PM

******

Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu's vote this week against abortion funding restrictions in health care legislation brought new attention to an issue that has long complicated her political life.

In her first Senate campaign in 1996, a retired archbishop in her heavily Catholic hometown of New Orleans said voting for her would be a sin. Now in her third term, Landrieu's support for abortion rights — a rare stance among Louisiana politicians of both parties — again faces criticism from abortion opponents.

Her vote Tuesday against an amendment by Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., to the health care bill now before the Senate brought immediate condemnation from the state Republican party and anti-abortion organizations that said she broke her own policy against government funding for abortion.

"Forcing the American people to pay for elective abortions is a line that no Louisiana Senator has ever crossed," said former Republican state Rep. Tony Perkins, now president of the conservative Family Research Council in Washington.

Landrieu said she voted against the amendment because she believed it also would take legal abortion coverage out of private insurance policies.

"One of the pledges we made at the start of this debate was that we would ensure that Americans who like their current health coverage would get to keep it," she said in a news release.

A moderate Democrat in a conservative state, Landrieu doesn't always toe the abortion-rights line. She had only a 20 percent rating in an analysis of 2008 Senate abortion votes by the National Abortion Rights Action League, down from 65 percent the year before.

"We don't always agree but we find her to be really thoughtful," NARAL policy director Donna Crane said in a telephone interview.

"She asks fair and tough questions of both sides, which we respect."

Landrieu's vote drew a relatively subdued response from Roman Catholic leaders. Nelson's amendment is supported by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

"We agree on many things, but definitely do not agree on the issue of abortion," New Orleans Archbishop Gregory M. Aymond said in a written response. "I will continue to be in prayerful, open dialogue with Senator Landrieu, and I continue to pray that the sanctity of life will be protected always."

It was a mild chastising compared to statements by Roman Catholic leaders against Landrieu in the past and other politicians who support abortion rights.

Rhode Island Rep. Patrick Kennedy has been in a verbal bout for weeks with outspoken Bishop Thomas Tobin, who says he asked Kennedy in 2007 not to receive Holy Communion because of his support for abortion rights. Kennedy also voted against abortion restrictions in the health care legislation in the House.

When Landrieu was running for a vacant Senate seat in 1996, popular retired archbishop Philip Hannan of New Orleans said a vote for her or then-President Bill Clinton would be a sin because of their abortion rights support.

Landrieu narrowly won that race against Republican Woody Jenkins, a leader of anti-abortion forces in the state Legislature. The issue returned six years later.

"As a practicing Catholic, I did not leave my faith, as did Mary Landrieu," Republican Suzanne Haik Terrell said during a close attempt to unseat Landrieu. Her challenger last year was another anti-abortion Republican but the issue rarely came up in the campaign.

Still, pollster and political analyst Bernie Pinsonat questions whether Landrieu can continue to survive politically. It's not just the abortion vote.

Landrieu — who won her Senate seat by margins of less than 1 percent, less than 2 percent and just over 2 percent in the last three elections — is burdened by the lack of popularity of President Barack Obama, who won less than 40 percent of the state's presidential vote.

Votes such as the one she cast to pass his economic stimulus package and another to allow debate on the Senate health care bill will have a detrimental effect, even with her next campaign five years away.

"She's got a very unpopular Barack Obama and she's following him down the road," Pinsonat said.
 

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

drunkeddie said on December 10, 2009 at 11:33 PM

Her moral conviction is for sale just like her vote.

psychohurricane said on December 11, 2009 at 12:50 AM

Mary Landrieu Who I Once Was a Proud Supporter Clearly Has Now Been In Washing Far Too Long And To The Point Where She Just Like Obama Have Agreed To Clearly Sell Us Out! Bring The Troups Home My happy Arse! YOU LIED! Both Lie and Could Not Care Less About Us As a Nation!

silverfox3 said on December 11, 2009 at 1:53 AM

Abortion is between a woman and her doctor. Not up for a public vote. This is a blatant case of government intrusion into a person's private life. No woman should be forced to give birth and I'm sick of a bunch of old men (who cheat on their wives) telling women what they should have to do in their private lives. Time to move on.

bailedout said on December 11, 2009 at 4:40 AM

She has failed to represent the people of our district and has chosen to represent her own agenda and that of Pres. Obama. Her own health care will not be affected and when she retires, she will retain same health care and roughly $300,000 yearly in pension. It is time for a change, unfortunately we have 5 more years of her.

joycem said on December 11, 2009 at 8:56 AM

Theres hop in Rhode Island at least, State Representative, businessman and retired Army colonel, John Loughlin is the pro-life guy taking on Patrick Kennedy! This guys is awesome, check him out at www.johnloughlin.org

celticfan said on December 11, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Uh, silverfox, forcing people to pay for something they consider morally offensive is the real intrusion of government into people's lives.

adam00000 said on December 11, 2009 at 12:39 PM

Silverfox, did you even read the story? Personally, if the libs are gonna throw something like this in the bill, I'd rather see them pay for birth control instead of abortions. Stop the leak at the source.

silverfox3 said on December 11, 2009 at 1:03 PM

celticfan....I am offended that women can be denied their rights while doctors hand out Viagra like Chiclets and insurance pays for them!! If men could get pregnant there would be a clinic on every corner.

psychohurricane said on December 11, 2009 at 5:36 PM

abortion is Murder plain and simple and wrong any way you cut it! there are more than enough methods of birth control short of stopping a beating heart! anyone who has had an abortion is a murderer plain and simple! not only does it result in the death of the unborn child it also wipes out the children that the aborted would have bore entire generations are snuffed out simply because some woman choose the thrill of the moment. weather it is a child in the womb or a 10 year old it is still a murder

shortcake said on December 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM

Landrieu has been bought like so many others. The public should not have to pay for abortions. Let the ones who support it donate their money to pay for it. Many people view abortion as sugar-coated cold-blooded murder. A baby in the womb has no choice when the mother elects to "terminate" him/her, but the woman has many options to chose from to prevent pregnancy from happening in the first place. Through simple but serious planning, the mother to be could spare herself a lifetime of despising herself for killing her own unborn child. It has been proven that it comes back to haunt most.