/ Katrina Recovery |
|
|
|
||
|
New Orleans, Louisiana |
Customize | Make This Your Home Page | E-mail newsletters | MySpecialsDirect |
|
Home Local
News Eye
on Hurricanes Eye on Floodgates Katrina
Photos
National 4Editorials
Weather
Sports
Frank
Davis Entertainment
Medical
Blogs
Links on 4 I-News Action Report Recovery Podcasts AP Podcasts News
Videos Traffic Palm/PDA
Edition
Lottery Results Business
Digital Gumbo Forums Mackie
& Meg Home/Garden Food
Spirit
of Louisiana E-cards
Auto News News Feeds/RSS
|
Storm of criticism pounds FEMA
Many blame merger into Homeland Security 07:41 AM EDT on Saturday, September 3, 2005
WASHINGTON – Horrified by TV images that depict appalling conditions
persisting in New Orleans day after harrowing day, Americans are
attacking the federal government for the slowness of its response to
Hurricane Katrina.
And no agency is coming under more scrutiny than the Federal Emergency
Management Agency – which was designated lead coordinator for the
federal disaster response to Katrina two days before the storm hit
shore. "I'm ashamed of America. I'm ashamed of our government," said
Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick, D-Mich. "I'm outraged by the lack of response
by our federal government."
Latest news: Today: See the effects: Give, get help: External links:
Though disaster planners have long ranked a direct hurricane strike on
New Orleans as one of the top three catastrophic scenarios facing the
U.S., authorities have lagged badly in evacuating the sick and
vulnerable, passing out food and water, deploying military assets and
quelling rampant lawlessness. And while the Superdome has long factored
in disaster preparedness plans as the city's main hurricane refuge, no
supplies were stocked there before the storm hit Monday.
Dr. Michael Lindell, a senior scholar at Texas A&M's Hazard Reduction
and Recovery Center, said he cannot comprehend why federal officials had
not deployed equipment and relief supplies before Katrina struck – or
mobilized to relieve clearly outflanked state and local resources.
"If it's a Category 5 hurricane, then frankly it doesn't take an
Einstein to figure out that it's going to overwhelm local capacity and
that they are going to be in a world of hurt," he said, referring to the
storm that fell to Category 4 by the time it hit shore. "You don't have
to wait until there are bodies floating around in the water to start
activating the National Guard."
Many disaster relief specialists blame FEMA's stumble on its diminished
standing within the government and a relentless focus on terrorism
prevention by the agency's new overseers.
In a post-9-11 reorganization, FEMA joined 21 other agencies in a new
Homeland Security Department, stripped of the Cabinet rank that had
allowed it to report directly to the president. And, in a further
department shuffle in July, FEMA lost its historic mission of working
with state and local governments on preparedness plans before disaster
strikes.
"It was a very powerful organization, with very, very seasoned people –
and then 9-11 came," said Bob Freitag, who spent 25 years at FEMA,
rising to federal coordinating officer.
Mr. Freitag, who now teaches at the University of Washington, and other
emergency management officials contend that with terrorism prevention
identified as the top Homeland Security mission, natural disaster
preparedness slipped in attention and resources.
Former FEMA Director James Lee Witt urged Congress last year to restore
the agency's independence, saying he was "extremely concerned that the
ability of our nation to prepare for and to respond to disasters has
been sharply eroded."
Homeland Security "has taken away people, has taken away money, has
taken away power and authority," Mr. Freitag said.
The agency, which doled out hundreds of millions of dollars in
preparedness grants to state and local responders, has lost that
function to Homeland Security's Office of Domestic Preparedness.
The Bush administration also canceled other FEMA programs, including a
Clinton administration-era disaster mitigation effort known as Project
Impact.
The upheavals haven't come without cost, some say.
"I just don't get why FEMA was not left alone," said Robert
Wheelersburg, a retired Army Reserve major who spent five years assigned
to FEMA's regional headquarters in Philadelphia. "There were a lot of
resignations and retirements within FEMA because it really was
demoralizing to say, 'Hey, you guys are a second-tier agency.' "
Homeland Security and FEMA officials sought Friday to quell the P.R.
storm, citing the vast scope of the damage and unprecedented
difficulties caused by major flooding, infrastructure damage,
communications breakdowns and criminal activity.
"We mobilized as never before in the federal family," said Patrick
Rhode, FEMA's deputy director.
Congressional committees vowed to investigate FEMA's response.
Watching the New Orleans devastation, Mr. Freitag, who worked 50
disasters, said FEMA is not performing anywhere near the caliber of past
disasters.
James Carafano, a homeland security expert at the conservative Heritage
Foundation, disagreed, saying it is "beyond the ridiculous" to think
that FEMA has been weakened since losing its independence. "This is the
single largest national disaster the U.S. has had in memory," he said.
"Define for me what a good response looks like."
Still, President Bush admitted before he set off Friday on a tour of the
devastated Gulf Coast that "the results are not acceptable."
Joe Myers, former head of emergency management for North Carolina and
later Florida, said state and local authorities must shoulder blame, too.
"I think FEMA is getting pretty much of a bum deal," he said of the
criticism lobbed at the federal responders by New Orleans Mayor Ray
Nagin, Louisiana emergency management officials and others.
FEMA "is there to support local response and state response," he said.
Staff writer Jim Landers contributed to this report.
E-mail
mmittelstadt@dallasnews.com
|
Advertising |
|
|
||