x
Breaking News
More () »

Supreme Court upholds cellphone robocall ban

The case only arose after Congress in 2015 created an exception in the law that allows the automated calls for collection of government debt.
Credit: AP
A March 15, 2019 view of the Supreme Court in Washington. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a 1991 law that bars robocalls to cellphones.

The case, argued by telephone in May because of the coronavirus pandemic, only arose after Congress in 2015 created an exception in the law that allowed the automated calls for collection of government debt.

Political consultants and pollsters were among those who asked the Supreme Court to strike down the entire 1991 law that bars them from making robocalls to cellphones as a violation of their free speech rights under the Constitution. The issue was whether, by allowing one kind of speech but not others, the exception made the whole law unconstitutional.

RELATED: Court could end claims Nestle, Cargill abetted child labor

RELATED: Supreme Court declines to hear Equal Pay Act case

RELATED: Supreme Court justices keep hold on secret Russia investigation material

Six justices agreed that by allowing debt collection calls to cellphones Congress “impermissibly favored debt-collection speech over political and other speech, in violation of the First Amendment," Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote. And seven justices agreed that the 2015 exception should be stricken from the law.

“Americans passionately disagree about many things. But they are largely united in their disdain for robocalls,” Kavanaugh noted at the outset of his opinion.

During arguments in the case in May, Justice Stephen Breyer got cut off when someone tried calling him. Breyer said after he rejoined the court’s arguments: “The telephone started to ring, and it cut me off the call and I don’t think it was a robocall.”

Credit: AP

Before You Leave, Check This Out